The Torpedo Factory Art Center: War and Art is an Oxymoron
The centralization of ownership of the private media in the United States and elsewhere has become increasingly pronounced, at the same time that its reporting has become increasingly one-sided and monolithic. My blog seeks to expose this lack of objectivity and present alternative ideas that point in the direction of much-needed fundamental change.
The cherry picking of the corporate
media undermines any pretense of objectivity. Today, USA Today cherry picked in
order to favor Ukraine against Russia. Its headline, “Ukraine: Head of Amnesty
International chapter quits. Russia begins attack on eastern Ukraine,” deflects
criticism of Ukraine for endangering the civilian population. Amnesty
International, which is hardly taking a pro-Russia position, criticized Ukraine
for launching missile attacks from schools, hospitals and other heavily
populated areas. If Palestinian groups like Hamas are accused of doing the same
in order to protest Israeli atrocities against Palestinian civilians, why not
draw the same conclusion about Zelenski? Just because Zelenski, who has proven to be a master
at PR, reacted irately to the Amnesty International report, it doesn’t mean
that the report lacks substance. The damage control argument in favor of the
Ukrainian governments is that the report is a “tool of Russian propaganda.”
Nowhere in the USA Today article is
there mention that the person who resigned, Oksana Pokalchuk, is herself Ukrainian. The article
does everything to create the impression that the Amnesty International’s
report just represents the viewpoint of one current within the organization. Thus
Pokalchuk claims that Amnesty International released the report “ignoring
the advice of staff members, who urged the group to revise its report.” It goes
without saying that not everyone in the organization is going to agree with such
a controversial opinion. But why does USA Today underscore the negative
reaction to the report? What should be underlined is the horrible consequences
of the actions of the Ukrainian army, another reason for which Washington should be a voice in favor of reaching a peace agreement and not the war’s
prolongation.
Beall-Dawson house museum,
Rockville Maryland
I found it interesting that the surrounding
community around the Beall-Dawson house, which was a slave plantation prior to
the Civil War, was inhabited by slaves and free African-Americans and they
called the community “Haiti.” At the time, Haiti was practically taboo for the
establishment in the U.S. because of the example it represented. The Haitian
revolution led by General Toussaint Louverture (who was born into slavery and then became a freeman who fought with
France and then led the rebellion against it) was perhaps the only slave
uprising in history in which the slaves took power and retained it. This was an
awful example for the U.S. southern slaveholders who northern political leaders
didn’t want to defy. Haiti at first was not even recognized by the U.S. even
though their recent revolution of independence paralleled ours of 1776. Nevertheless,
for African Americans, Haiti was a source of pride and inspiration as it is for
many to this day.