Damage Control: “USA Today” Article Deflects Criticism of the Ukrainian Government
The cherry picking of the corporate
media undermines any pretense of objectivity. Today, USA Today cherry picked in
order to favor Ukraine against Russia. Its headline, “Ukraine: Head of Amnesty
International chapter quits. Russia begins attack on eastern Ukraine,” deflects
criticism of Ukraine for endangering the civilian population. Amnesty
International, which is hardly taking a pro-Russia position, criticized Ukraine
for launching missile attacks from schools, hospitals and other heavily
populated areas. If Palestinian groups like Hamas are accused of doing the same
in order to protest Israeli atrocities against Palestinian civilians, why not
draw the same conclusion about Zelenski? Just because Zelenski, who has proven to be a master
at PR, reacted irately to the Amnesty International report, it doesn’t mean
that the report lacks substance. The damage control argument in favor of the
Ukrainian governments is that the report is a “tool of Russian propaganda.”
Nowhere in the USA Today article is
there mention that the person who resigned, Oksana Pokalchuk, is herself Ukrainian. The article
does everything to create the impression that the Amnesty International’s
report just represents the viewpoint of one current within the organization. Thus
Pokalchuk claims that Amnesty International released the report “ignoring
the advice of staff members, who urged the group to revise its report.” It goes
without saying that not everyone in the organization is going to agree with such
a controversial opinion. But why does USA Today underscore the negative
reaction to the report? What should be underlined is the horrible consequences
of the actions of the Ukrainian army, another reason for which Washington should be a voice in favor of reaching a peace agreement and not the war’s
prolongation.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home