The
New York Times calls Trump’s decision to withdraw troops from Syria and Afghanistan
abrupt and instead advocates a much-needed national debate over “the future of
American wars.” What has the New York Times done to promote such a debate?
After all we’ve been in Afghanistan for 17 years. That’s five times longer than
our participation in World War II. And now the NY Times says it’s time for a
debate and criticizes Trump for acting impulsively. Another example of the
mainstream media’s abdication of the role of critical thinker when it comes to
U.S. foreign policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment