The centralization of ownership of the private media in the United States and elsewhere has become increasingly pronounced, at the same time that its reporting has become increasingly one-sided and monolithic. My blog seeks to expose this lack of objectivity and present alternative ideas that point in the direction of much-needed fundamental change.
Sunday, May 3, 2020
TRUMP AND HIS “ACTIVIST JUDGES”
For years, right-wing
talk show hosts and other right-wingers railed against Democrats for appointing
ideologically committed judges, thus corrupting the nation’s judicial system and gutting it of its professional
qualifications. They called these judges “activist judges” because they favored
legalized abortion, affirmative action, civil rights consideration for minority
groups and other unethical positions. In 2002 Rush Limbaugh wrote a piece
titled “Why Liberals will do Anything to Get Activist Judges.” But in the 2016 presidential
campaign, Trump vowed to name conservative judges who would back conservative
positions, and in doing to secured the financial backing of the Koch brothers, the DeVos
family, etc. During his 3 years in office, this is exactly what he has done, unabashedly.
That’s because the new right and the neo-cons are more upfront about their tactics
and agenda than the traditional right. Now these Trump-appointed judges are claiming
that they have the right to belong to the hardly politically neutral Federalist
Society. Today’s New York Times reported that “all but eight of Mr. Trump’s 51 appointees to
the appellate bench had ties to the organization, nearly twice as many as under
President George W. Bush. All but six of Mr. Trump’s appellate appointees
signed the letter” asserting the right to belong to the Federalist Society. “Do as I say not as I do” appears to be the motto of
the U.S. right.
No comments:
Post a Comment